Following his confession to Sonya, Crime and also Punishment’s Raskolnikov do the efforts to explain the thinking behind his murder. This segment of the novel illuminates the an essential irrationality of Raskolnikov’s ostensibly reasonable reasoning. It additionally portrays Raskolnikov’s fragmentised thought, his absence of self-awareness and also understanding, and also Sonya’s duty in bringing that to face his crime in the hopes of achieve an emotional and intellectual honesty the will collection the phase for his last redemption.Raskolnikov moves through number of explanations because that the engine of his murder, each one contradicting and also supplanting the vault one. His an initial explanation is that he just wanted to rob the pawnbroker for she money. He then rejects this explanation by recalling the he yes, really did not require or want the money. The did not steal the end of hunger and, though he did want to help his mother, the did no steal for his family. Us should also recall the he treats money fairly casually, having offered money to 3 others: a vulnerably drunken girl, Marmeladov, and Katerina Ivanovna. Moreover, that never even cared come look at the pawnbroker’s purse after he stole it and does not also know if there is any kind of money in it. Finally, he knows this explanation is wrong because it does not adequately account for his present suffering and also guilt: “If I’d killed them only due to the fact that I was hungry… i would now be… happy!” (413)

You are watching: Why did raskolnikov kill the pawnbroker

Struggling for a much more adequate explanation, the proposes the uselessly abstract statement, “I have actually a wicked heart” (414). Realizing that he demands to come up through something much more substantial and detailed, the concludes the he cursed the crime to watch if he could be choose Napoleon in asserting his will and overstepping traditional boundaries. His following vain explanation is the he stole the money so the he might support self at the university without having to rely on the sacrifices of his mother and also sister. The eagerly by this explanation despite the truth that he had previously garbage the idea the he committed the murder because that money or the end of problem for his family. As soon as Sonya questions whether this explanation is sufficient, Raskolnikov haphazardly tacks on the extra forgive that, ~ all, he had only eliminated a “louse.” Subsequently, he provides the incoherent explanation the his spitefulness and also the destitution the his material environment had command him to a murderous state of mind. After rejecting this line of thought, Raskolnikov finally settles ~ above characterizing the engine of his killing as an attempt to test the end his extraordinary guy theory. He states that he wanted to affirm his intellectual superiority and his best to dominion over ordinary males by daring to kill.For each explanation, Raskolnikov oscillates dramatically in between certainty and also uncertainty. He confidently claims that he killed the pawnbroker to plunder her, “of course,” but almost immediately rejects it, saying, “That’s not quite right” (413). About his explanation that he is wicked, he tells Sonya, “Take keep in mind of that, it can explain a lot” (414). Then, in the exact same paragraph, the discards it: “All this is not it” (414). His fluctuations are so too much that that manages come reject and also defend the very same hypothesis in a solitary breath: “You have the right to see for you yourself that’s no it!… yet it’s the truth” (416). Next, that greedily latches ~ above the Napoleon explanation, exclaiming, “Why not, ~ all! … due to the fact that that is how it was!” (415). Regardless of the significant confidence with which he starts each explanation, the “Why not, ~ all” betrays the insecurities that end up undermining each among them. That goes on come confirm, “That’s specifically how that was” (415). He uses the indigenous “precisely” as if he had actually sharply defined and concluded the exact reasons for his murder. Despite his pundit commitment come precision and thoroughly formulated exactitude, his thoughts emerge as a hopelessly jumbled variety of contradictions. He cannot understand the complexity and also irrationality of his killing motive, though it is a motive he had meticulously and also rationally pre-meditated. Nor deserve to he admit his intellectual limitations in expertise himself. Thus, Raskolnikov desperately grasps at anything that will pass together a coherent and also satisfying explanation. That admits the absurdity of his Napoleon explanation, calling it “nonsense, practically sheer babble” (415), only to replace it v the equally dubious explanation that he wanted the pawnbroker’s money to support himself in college. He concludes, “Well, that’s all” (416), implying that he had effectively accounted for whatever in his recent all-encompassing explanation. When again, that rejects it, saying, “All the is not it… There room quite various reasons here, quite, rather different!” (416). Raskolnikov snatches anxiously in ~ the next viable explanation the enters his mind: “He started again… together if an unexpected rotate of thought had struck him and also aroused the anew. ‘Better… suppose…"” (417). In delineating his explanation of just how spitefulness and insanity lead him in the direction of murder, he interjects three parenthetical phrases to stabilize and support his wobbly new hypothesis. These parenthetical interjections likewise serve come indicate how fragmented, jumbled, and also discordant Raskolnikov’s thoughts are.Raskolnikov resorts to claiming the he has actually an adequate explanation, however simply can not articulate it. He asks, wracking his mind, “What am ns going come tell you?” (414). That cannot manage to to organize his chaotic thoughts right into words: “I need to speak now, and I don’t even know just how to begin” (414). Whenever that does manage to speak something, he says with defeat and also frustration, “Again I’m not telling it right!” (417). The dismisses every little thing he states as “babble,” utterances lugged out in an incoherent or meaninglessly repetitious manner, or as “nonsense,” indigenous or language containing no definition or conveying no easy to understand ideas. In spite of all his efforts to neatly outline the motivations behind his murder, Raskolnikov only manages come spout discordant and also slipshod half-notions.His attempts to think through and articulate an sufficient explanation need the exertion of too much mental effort. The narrator mentions several times that Raskolnikov speaks “pensively.” Raskolnikov also occasionally “stopped and fell to thinking,” or “fell silent, and also thought it over for a lengthy time” (415). Once offering one explanation, Raskolnikov sounds like “he to be speaking as if by rote” (416), due to the fact that he had pre-formulated this explanation with meticulous and painstaking thought. That cannot manage to simply “tell directly out” (415) why he cursed the murder because, rather of admitting pundit defeat, the goes through a self-deceptive and also long-winded thought procedure to devise convincing rationalizations. He often has to “reconsider,” come rethink his explanation over and over again by revising, discarding, and also replacing. As soon as he is “recollecting himself,” the is in reality recollecting the fragmented and dualistic parts of his schizophrenic personality, while additionally recollecting all his likewise muddled and incongruent thoughts.After all this mental exertion, Raskolnikov admits failure, saying “Ah, what a stupid thing to come the end with, eh?” (413). Regardless of all the confidence and value he locations upon his pundit capabilities and rational thought, a emotion of impotence and also futility overwhelms him: “In some type of powerlessness he dragged himself to the end of his story and hung his head” (416). Without emotion or passion, v intellect and reason, that “drags” himself to forcibly contrived explanations. The psychological toll upon him also manifests chin physically as Raskolnikov periodically hangs his head, stop his head, and also eventually establishes a headache. The narrator tells united state that “a terrible powerlessness confirmed through his agitated state that mind” (417).Raskolnikov faults Sonya for every the anguish and frustration he experiences in trying come hash the end an explanation. She is, after ~ all, the one who requirements from the an knowledge of his crime. The pleas to her, “Stop it, Sonya!” (412) and “Don’t torment me, Sonya!” (413). Rather than confronting the issue, he desire to disregard it and also brush the aside. That hastily supplies his explanations with rash overconfidence, break up “Well, however enough the that!” (416). However each time, that realizes that Sonya one of two people does not know or go not believe his explanation, which as soon as again thrusts him earlier into the excruciating process of strangling the truth out of himself.Sonya sees the Raskolnikov “understand nothing, simply nothing!” (418). She believes that honesty with himself will allow him to acknowledge his sin, which will certainly prepare him for confession. Confession is crucial for suffering, which consequently is crucial for redemption and a go back to God and also society. However, Raskolnikov has challenge handling the weight of emotional and intellectual honesty, and the enduring it promises to inflict. He reacts harshly versus Sonya’s referrals to difficult labor in Siberia and also “he all of sudden felt that heavy and painful to it is in loved” (422) by her.Because Sonya passively pressures him to challenge his crime, that periodically falls to tormenting her. Anytime he can not think of one explanation, the starts lamenting end the truth that he had actually ever come to her. Sonya meekly accepts the suffering that he overcome on come her. When Raskolnikov speak Sonya, “You won’t understand any type of of it” (414), she declares the she will make every initiative to try to understand. Ironically, he self does not understand what the is saying and also what his real motive was for death the pawnbroker. That is merely projecting his own confusion, bewilderment, and perplexity ~ above Sonya. He features his inability to articulate one explanation come Sonya’s inability to comprehend. He factors that, due to the fact that she would not understand it anyway, the does not need to offer one explanation. Sonya, as the Christ-like number of the novel, willingly accepts Raskolnikov’s forecast of suffering, shame, and desperation.Sonya’s prodding eventually does start Raskolnikov into voluntary reflection. He admits, “I’m lying Sonya… I’ve been lying for a long time” (416), thus opening up the possibility that, by recognizing his pundit dishonesty, the will pertained to face the true nature of his crime. When she efficiently forces the issue, he stops struggling through her and begins to battle with himself. In fact, “he was no longer concerned with even if it is she interpreted or not” (418). His dialogue with her nearly turns right into a monologue. He essentially starts conversing with himself, an activity that is continual with his schizophrenia and his internal struggle between double personalities.Raskolnikov end up fixing that the extraordinary guy theory was his an ideas for murder. That admits the all his various other excuses, indigenous a desire for money to concern over his family, space all secondary rationalizations expected to conceal the “true” factor behind his crime. That recalls that as soon as he was contemplating the murder, “I believed it all out and whispered it every out when I was lying there in the dark… I argued it all out through myself, to the critical trace, and also I know everything, everything!” (418). In spite of the reality that he had actually previously believed through his murder motivations in meticulous detail, Raskolnikov claims that he “had wanted to forget everything” (418), and thus blocked the end his storage of these deliberations. Together a result, he needs to retrace the entire process in his dialogue with Sonya in order come rediscover his killing motivations.In recalling his formulation that the extraordinary male theory, Raskolnikov start to realize the folly the relying on reason. He speak Sonya, “Do you really think I entered it headlong, favor a fool? No, I entered it prefer a glowing boy, and that’s what destroyed me!” (418). Going into it “headlong, favor a fool” would indicate spontaneity and also passion. Raskolnikov, ~ above the other hand, to be a “bright boy,” one who ignored his impulses and also valued his intellect, i beg your pardon he used to premeditate the murder. Here, Raskolnikov starts to realize that it would have actually been far better to it is in a “fool” than a “bright boy.”However, he continues to think in the soundness that his extraordinary guy theory. He simply contends the he is the wrong human to have carried it out. By saying that he “know everything, everything,” Raskolnikov lends a false clarity, firmness, and also consistency come his expertise of his killing motives. He fails to an alert that his very closely thought-out theory was fraught with contradictions indigenous the an extremely beginning. Because that example, he competed that the extraordinary male is superior, and thus is over morality, social responsibility, and concern because that the rest of humanity. However, Raskolnikov likewise said it is the especially man’s duty to utter a “new word” i beg your pardon is eventually meant to benefit mankind. He murdered the pawnbroker both to view if the was remarkable and over God and morality, and additionally because he to be doing mankind a donate by death a “louse” and using her money for much better purposes. His extraordinary man theory is together contradictory, fragmented, and also incomplete together the entire process in which he tries to describe his killing motives to Sonya. Raskolnikov’s theory and explanations for his murder only provide the false illusion of being logical. In addition, he falls short to offer credit to several incidental circumstances that helped with the murder, like when he accidentally overheard the conversation about the pawnbroker’s worthlessness, once he overheard the time when the pawnbroker would certainly be alone, and also when he discovered an ax indigenous the porter.By the end of this segment the the novel, Raskolnikov does no admit that his extraordinary male theory is wrong. However, Sonya has actually succeeded in stripping away many of Raskolnikov’s self-deceptions.

See more: Utorrent Error Can T Open Torrent File S, Error: Can'T Open

That vaguely starts to feeling that his prided mental abilities room pitifully limited and that man, gift a fundamentally irrational creature, is incapable of completely logical and consistent thought. Sonya’s meekness and willingness come share in the suffering affiliated in Raskolnikov’s emotional and also intellectual purification enables him to get in into a state that introspection and perplexity the will ultimately lead him come confession and also redemption.*All text citations based upon the translation by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky, Vintage Classics, c.1992